View/Edit arkL Database event - base C18n.1n

NB The age of the event may be set by placement within an interval (pup), placement between 2 events (pub), offset from an event or as a preset.
If data is given for more than one of these the priority is preset over offset over pub over pup.

Mode selector

Event Selector The age-window currently being used to search for terms for autocompletion is -10.418 -> 89.582 Ma.
event above: base C17
event below: base C18n.1r

base event of: C18n.1n;
top event of: C18n.1r;

Event data

4
term: Id:6052 sort: 434
Event Type: Event Display:Sub-columnE:Column: id:128
Taxon:
dataset: magnetochronology (dataset id = 4)
stage:
notes_2004:
notes_2020:
compilation_notes:
refs to add:
linked refs:
Placement by pup up within interval: id:
Placement by pub
higher event: id: (Ma)
lower event: id: (Ma)
Placement by offset offset from event: link to event: (id: )
preset_age:
preset_age_notes:
Age39.5820 Δ=0
Tracecode:     Equation:
Age 2020     Original age 2020 (where age has been corrected by me)

if you were a logged in editor there would be an input button here

Go to: arkLpopulate :: arkL data upload

Event References

Dataset References

Cande, S. C. & Kent, D. V. (1995). Revised calibration of the Geomagnetic Polarity time scale for the Late Cretaceous and Cenozoic. Journal of Geophysical Research. 100: 6093-6095. gs

Hansma, J., et al. (2015). Late Devonian carbonate magnetostratigraphy from the Oscar and Horse Spring Ranges, Lennard Shelf, Canning Basin, Western Australia. Earth and Planetary Science Letters. 409: 232-242. gs

Hounslow, M. W. & Balabanov, Y. P. (2018). A geomagnetic polarity timescale for the Permian, calibrated to stage boundaries. In, Lucas, S. G. , and Shen, S. Z. (ed.) The Permian Timescale. Geological Society of London, Special Publications . 450: 61-103. gs

Hounslow, M. K. & Muttoni, G. (2010). The geomagnetic polarity timescale for the Triassic: linkage to stage boundary definitions. In, Lucas, S. G. (ed.) The Triassic Timescale. Geological Society of London, Special Publications . 334: 61-102. gs

Hounslow, M. W. (2020). A geomagnetic polarity time scale for the Carboniferous. Geological Society of London, Special Publications. in press.: -. gs

Husson, D., et al. (2011). Astronomical calibration of the Maastrichtian. Earth and Planetary Science Letters. 305: 328-340. gs

Kent, D. V., et al. (2018). Empirical evidence for stability of the 405-kiloyear Jupiter-Venus eccentricity cycle over hundreds of million years. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA. 115(24): 6153-6158. gs

Ogg, J. G. (2020). Chapter 5 - Geomagnetic polarity time scale. In, Gradstein, F. M. , Ogg, J. G. , Schmitz, M. D. , and Ogg, G. M. (ed.) The Geologic Time Scale 2020. Elsevier, Boston, MA 1: 159-192. gs

Steiner, M. B. (2006). The magnetic polarity time scale across the Permian Triassic boundary. In, Lucas, S. G. , Cassinis, G. , and Schneider, J. W. (ed.) Non-Marine Permian Biostratigraphy and Biochronology. Geological Society of London, Special Publications . 265: 15-38. gs

Thibault, N., et al. (2012). Astronomical calibration of upper Campanian Maastrichtian carbon isotope events and calcareous plankton biostratigraphy in the Indian Ocean (ODP Hole 762C): implication for the age of the Campanian Maastrichtian boundary. Palaeogeography Palaeoclimatology Palaeoecology. 37- 378: 52-71. gs

Zhang, Y., et al. (2020). Late Triassic magnetostratigraphy from the Germanic Basin and the global correlation of the Carnian Pluvial Episode. Earth and Planetary Science Letters. 541: 1-15. gs