arkL edit interval

arkL

select id,columnx from arkL_columns where dataset_id like 10

View/Edit arkL Database interval - T. reicheli pfZ

Navigation

The age-window currently being used to search for terms for autocompletion is 48.685 -> 148.85 Ma.

	interval above:	R. cushmani pfZ
parent-intervals:	this interval:	T. reicheli pfZ	sub-intervals:
	interval below:	T. globotruncanoides pfZ

Mode selector

Interval data

intervalx:	T. reicheli pfZhas added abv?yesid: 3509 sort:
alternative_term:	T. reicheli zoneblock label:
formal term:	Thalmanninella reicheli pfZ
interval_type:
parent_interval:
dataset:	forams - planktic (dataset id = 10)
alt dataset:	(dataset id = )
TSC Column:	id:104
stage:
colour:
interval_notes:	DOTTED -- VERY BRIEF. Formerly called "Rotalipora reicheli". "Shortest zone .. characterized by the occurrence of the zonal marker that is typically extremely rare." (Coccioni and Silva, 2015), who show it as spanning caa. 10% to 12.5% up in Cenomanian thickness (only 75 cm width) at Gubbio -- but they call it "Middle Cenomanian" (with R. cushman being "late-Middle through latest Cenomanian), therefore used 25-27.5% up here. SEPM’98 assigns as base of Middle Cenomanian; but Leg 171B table which implied a basal age ~1 myr older than base of Middle Cenomanian.
compilation_notes:
refs to add:
linked refs:
preset_duration:
preset_duration_notes:
tracecode	; Q1base from event age; Q2top from event age; Q3a duration from base & top

	age2020	age		event	event_id	pup	in interval	age	age2020
Top:		98.6850	<---	FAD Rotalipora cushmani	4364	0.2750	Cenomanian	98.685	00098.6900
Base:		98.8500	<---	FAD Thalmanninella reicheli	4365	0.2500	Cenomanian	98.85	00098.8500
base notes	Thalmanninella reicheli:<br>Datum calibration/notes = DOTTED -- VERY BRIEF. Formerly called "Rotalipora reicheli". "Shortest zone .. characterized by the occurrence of the zonal marker that is typically extremely rare." (Coccioni and Silva, 2015), who show it as spanning caa. 10% to 12.5% up in Cenomanian thickness (only 75 cm width) at Gubbio -- but they call it "Middle Cenomanian" (with R. cushman being "late-Middle through latest Cenomanian), therefore used 25-27.5% up here. SEPM’98 assigns as base of Middle Cenomanian; but Leg 171B table which implied a basal age ~1 myr older than base of Middle Cenomanian..				comp notes

if you were a logged in editor there would be an input button here

Interval References

Dataset References