arkL edit interval

arkL

select id,columnx from arkL_columns where dataset_id like 2

View/Edit arkL Database interval - Acanthohoplites nolani TAZ

Navigation

The age-window currently being used to search for terms for autocompletion is 64.3722 -> 166.7412 Ma.

	interval above:	Hypacanthoplites jacobi TAZ
parent-intervals:	this interval:	Acanthohoplites nolani TAZ	sub-intervals: Diadochoceras nodosocostatum TAsZ;
	interval below:	Parahoplites melchioris TAZ

Mode selector

Interval data

intervalx:	Acanthohoplites nolani TAZhas added abv?yesid: 3104 sort:332
alternative_term:	A. nolani TAZblock label:
formal term:
interval_type:
parent_interval:
dataset:	ammonites Tethyan (dataset id = 2)
alt dataset:	(dataset id = )
TSC Column:	id:15
stage:
colour:
interval_notes:
compilation_notes:
refs to add:
linked refs:
preset_duration:
preset_duration_notes:
tracecode	; Q1base from event age; Q2top from event age; Q3a duration from base & top

	age2020	age		event	event_id	pup	in interval	age	age2020
Top:		114.3722	<---	base ""Hypacanthoplites"" jacobi TAZ	3422	0.0000	just below Jacob level (C13 spke)	114.3722	00114.3700
Base:		116.7412	<---	base Acanthohoplites nolani TAZ	3424	0.0000	C13 level	116.7412	00116.7400
base notes	SEE NOTE ON CONFLICT with GERMAN Ar-Ar dated version !. Zone is also called ""Nolaniceras nolani"". PROBLEM: (1) Ammonite A. nolanii BASE is DASHED at about FN1 = Fal. Nolan Lms marker #1 in Vocontian composite [Luber et al., 2019, Cret.Res. Suppl.X10] (=trough in C13 in Herrle et al’s 2014 composite, just above base Piobbico Cycle 40). Genus was only abbreviated as H. in Herrle, N. in Luber’s comparison table, and A. on their Vocontian diagram. BUT: (2) Base of Nolani (hence, top of P. nutfieldiensis zone) is constrained in Germany by 114.86 +/-0.37 Ar/Ar (SInger et al., GSA Nov’15 presentation) which verifies and enhances Obradovich’s 114 +/-1.3 Ma; therefore Base of this zone set as 114.8 Ma. This was similar to GTS04 = set at 115 Ma to fit the constraint of an Ar-Ar age of 114 +/-1.3 Ma within that underlying zone. This also fits its calibration to foraminifer datums (Belliers et al., 2000) on chart of Leckie et al. (2002; after scaling to 125 Ma at base-Aptian). BUT, in GTS2008 - was DASHED as 1/4th up in T. bejaouensis Foram zone (on composite meters) based on Herrle et al. (2004) in SE France composite, which had thought to be a bit more reliable than the +/-1.3 Ma in GTS2004; but is now (Singer et al., 2015) determined much more precise. [HOWEVER, DOES NOT FIT ESTIMATED RELATIVE THICKNESSES IN VOCONTIAN IN HERRLE ET AL 2004; but those were ""dashed""]. My guess is that German zone boundary is not same as SE France zone boundary usage.				comp notes

if you were a logged in editor there would be an input button here

Interval References

Dataset References